Archive for November 4th, 2009
The other is that Australia exports uranium to the world, while Japan has accumulated huge stocks of plutonium and will shortly commence its commercial production. In this sense, these two countries together form the front and back … extent can the role of nuclear weapons for security, including in the Asia Pacific be reduced? And secondly, how much can the arbitrary spread of nuclear energy and technology, which link to risks of nuclear proliferation, be prevented? …
More: continued here
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
The drawbacks of the system by GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy are that the fast reactors involved are very costly and the reprocessing technology involves handling highly radioactive material practices yet to be proven on industrial scale. … Lisa Price, a senior executive of GE Hitachi unit Nuclear Fuel Cycle said the GE Hitachi ARC would have the additional advantage of not extracting plutonium, which can be used for nuclear weapons. Current reprocessing methods, deployed …
More: continued here
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
Commentators with an incomplete understanding of what it takes to build nuclear weapons often assume that the acquisition of nuclear energy could be an easy stepping stone to nuclear weapons. There are ways that nuclear power programmes can contribute to weapons development, but nuclear power technology alone cannot be put to use to develop nuclear weapons without either uranium enrichment or plutonium reprocessing. None of the Asean countries has any plan to introduce …
More: continued here
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
News, Facts and Commentary Related to the Use of Nuclear Energy to Make Our World Safer, Cleaner, and Less Dependent on Fossil Fuels. Clean. Media Misses the Mark on North Korean Nukes. November 03, 2009 07:24 PM PST. I awoke this morning to news reports that North Korea has once again resumed their production of plutonium for nuclear weapons. I suspect that’s no real surprise to anyone who pays attention to such things. After all, they threw IAEA inspectors out this …
More: continued here
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
I awoke this morning to news reports that North Korea has once again resumed their production of plutonium for nuclear weapons. I suspect that’s no real surprise to anyone who pays attention to such things. … In the end, failing to understand these differences can contribute to policy decisions and regulations that could deprive society of the benefits of nuclear energy. Here’s what you need to remember: Used fuel from commercial nuclear power plants can not be used to …
More: continued here
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
One can either make plutonium-239 in a nuclear reactor or enrich uranium. [17] There are two different kinds of plutonium: reactor-grade and weapons-grade. Plutonium, in both cases, is a valuable energy source when integrated into the …
More: continued here
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments
“The characteristics of the complex, including the cooling water capacities, bear a strong similarity to those of a nuclear reactor, something which urgently requires clarification,” says one IAEA expert. In the cautious language of UN officials, …. Operation Orchard achieved only one thing: If the Iranians had planned to build a “spare” nuclear plant in Syria, that is, a backup plutonium factory, their plans were thwarted. But Tehran has time on its side. …
More: continued here
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments
According to this version of the story, Al Kibar was to be a backup plant for the heavy-water reactor under construction near the Iranian city of Arak, designed to provide plutonium to build a bomb if Iran did not succeed in constructing a weapon using …. They told the inspectors that it had been a conventional weapons factory, and not a nuclear reactor, which they would have been required to report to the IAEA. They also insisted that foreigners had not been involved. …
More: continued here
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments
Weaponizing Plutonium? Vague statement at best. NK has a small (by western standards), nuclear reactor and the capability to produce plutonium is very limited. Consider that the best reactors in Hanford have a final output of one half …
More: continued here
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments
Reprocessing the spent fuel rods would give the regime enough weapons-grade plutonium for at least one more atomic bomb, experts say. Pyongyang is believed to have enough weaponized plutonium for half a dozen nuclear weapons. …. June 10th , 2009 Russia agrees to take nuclear waste from SerbiaBELGRADE, Serbia — Russia agreed Wednesday to take 3 metric tons of spent fuel from a closed Serbian nuclear reactor to ensure the radioactive waste does not end up in terrorist …
More: continued here
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments