Archive for August 17th, 2009

Power Engineering Article Looks at Recycling Option in the US

As the director of the back-end sector, strategy and international projects, he answered some tough questions about the future of nuclear energy and recycling in the United States. “As you see, this won’t happen overnight, …

More: continued here

Monday, August 17th, 2009

Plutonium – False hope?

Like their firm stance on the whole nuclear issue, Plutonium escapes no different fate. Maybe we need another bigger disaster to make us realize how deadly Nuclear energy really is….or maybe we don’t…

More: continued here

Monday, August 17th, 2009

The Manifestation of Protagonist: Nuclear energy is not an option

Plutonium is an inevitable consequence of nuclear power production. The plutonium is contained in the spent nuclear fuel. It is one of the most radiotoxic and dangerous substances in existence. A single microgram, smaller than a speck …

More: continued here

Monday, August 17th, 2009

Submarine reactor was built from land-based prototype : India

The 82.5 MW nuclear reactor for submarine has been designed here by PRP Centre - PRP originally stood for Plutonium Reprocessing Project - under the BARC. The PRP Centre is located inside the Kalpakkam nuclear enclave, …

More: continued here

Monday, August 17th, 2009

White Noise: Nuclear not as bad as you're being led to believe?

According to the World Nuclear Association, during the 1980s one new nuclear reactor started up every 17 days on average, and by the year 2015 this rate could increase to one every 5 days. … Reprocessing can potentially recover up to 95% of the remaining uranium and plutonium in spent nuclear fuel, putting it into new mixed oxide fuel. This results in a reduction in long term radioactivity within the remaining waste, since this is largely short-lived fission products, …

More: continued here

Monday, August 17th, 2009

PYCO Wind Turbine Construction Timelapse (short) | Wind Power 4 All

As soon as people stop thinking every nuclear reactor is going to turn into a Chernobyl or Hiroshima, the sooner we’ll get to clean, renewable energy. But wind is still good. Love it. Reply. jefferygomer says: May 20, 2008 at 6:57 pm … what happens when nuclear we peak plutonium or thorium or whichever radioactive fuel you use as an energy source? will the US invade other countries rich in these fuels in the future? We can easily fulfill our energy needs with renewables …

More: continued here

Monday, August 17th, 2009

နီခမ္းနိန္းေကာင္ မွ က်ဳိ,ဆြဳမ္

The two men, interviewed extensively by a strategic analyst and a journalist over the course of two years, said they were part of a clandestine effort aided by North Korea to construct an underground nuclear facility capable of producing weapon-grade plutonium. They also said Myanmar had supplied … While satellite photos do suggest a network of underground tunnels in Myanmar, some analysts say they are located in an unlikely spot for a nuclear reactor, Reuters reported. …

More: continued here

Monday, August 17th, 2009

wildsingapore news: Nuclear power in Malaysia: Costly and unsafe

We cannot afford an accident in a nuclear reactor – it’ll be disastrous. “If we have an explosion like Chernobyl, radiation will destroy a large part of the country and the people. In Chernobyl, the radiation reached as far as … Plutonium , one of the substances used to produce nuclear energy, has a half-life of 24400 years. That means in 24400 years the radiation from plutonium will be halved. That means 244 centuries. We’re talking about radioactive waste forever. …

More: continued here

Monday, August 17th, 2009

Scholars and Rogues » The Buddhist bomb

Burma’s isolated military junta is building a secret nuclear reactor and plutonium extraction facilities with North Korean help, with the aim of acquiring its first nuclear bomb in five years, according to evidence from key defectors. …

More: continued here

Monday, August 17th, 2009

Green Animal Shelter & Sanctuary (GrASS): Article: Costly and unsafe

One year later, it collapses. We cannot afford an accident in a nuclear reactor – it’ll be disastrous. A plutonium pellet. “If we have an explosion like Chernobyl, radiation will destroy a large part of the country and the people. …

More: continued here

Monday, August 17th, 2009