Archive for July 3rd, 2009

CrossTalk: Is nuclear energy the answer? « Environmental

But my single greatest objection to the use of nuclear energy is what do we do to dispose of radioactive waste, which lasts for thousands and thousands of years. Plutonium has a half-life of 24000 years! What is that? 240 centuries! …

More: continued here

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Can Singapore say no to nuclear energy?

“Vessels carrying uranium, plutonium and nuclear wastes would make a juicy target for terrorists. Someone will get lucky one day — imagine the consequences,” But even if Singapore prefers to stick to renewable energy technologies, …

More: continued here

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Nuclear Power: The Truth.

A nuclear reactor uses fission, or the splitting of atoms, such as plutonium or uranium, to create heat, which is transferred to a coolant, such as water or helium. The coolant is used to turn a turbine. …

More: continued here

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Nuclear Energy by David Bodansky « Amateur Earthling

Nuclear Energy by David Bodansky I just finished David Bodansky’s 600+ page tome Nuclear Energy. It’s almost a textbook, but not quite. I don’t know who the intended audience is really. Other than me. ….. the distant future to go digging around in the waste repository: once the dangerous fission products have decayed away, the remaining fissile actinides potentially become available for weaponization, that is, the waste repository becomes a so-called “plutonium mine”. …

More: continued here

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

news20090703NTC - IEeeS TechSupport Inoue Sogakukan 井上創学館

The move may prove a fatal blow to the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) set up by previous president George W. Bush. Nature News looks at the decision, what it means for US nuclear policy, and where a long-hoped-for nuclear … Plutonium and unused uranium isotopes can be chemically extracted and put into new fuel pellets that in turn can be used in specially designed reactors. France, Japan, the United Kingdom and Russia already reprocess fuel for commercial use, …

More: continued here

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Lily Riahi: Should Renewable Energy Include Nuclear?

But, a worldwide energy economy based on plutonium raises very worrisome issues of nuclear weapon proliferation. Plutonium can, in theory, be separated from reactor fuel rods by chemical means, and the plutonium then used to make bombs. …

More: continued here

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

CrossTalk: Is nuclear energy the answer? « Environmental

We are talking about radioactive waste forever. Nahrul: But that is what makes plutonium very valuable today. The long half-life. Now they are closing the loop. Plutonium can be used as a fuel for another type of nuclear reactor. …

More: continued here

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

theblogprof: The Fermi Chronicles - Part 17: Nuclear Events

… the Windscale reactor in Cumberland, England (now Sellefield) was an experimental reactor commissioned in the mid-1940s not to investigate the possibility of civilian uses for nuclear power, but rather to manufacture plutonium for …

More: continued here

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

UN ambassador: US closely monitoring NKorean ship

Since 2003, they have focused on persuading the North to disable a nuclear reactor north of Pyongyang, where the communist regime had been laboriously extracting plutonium, not a naturally occurring material, from spent fuel rods. …

More: continued here

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

World Trade Center Demolition: The Final Word on The Tritium

That is, pure fusion does not allow for the China Syndrome as any remnants of pure fusion components (such as deuterium or tritium) do not allow for this– only Uranium or Plutonium fissioning can. … These included the “nuclear reactor” hypothesis being thoroughly unnecessary and impossible, as is his and the Finn’s claim that a single nuke destroyed each tower. (Tahil also incorrectly stated that a fission nuke uses up 100% of its fissile material, when it is only 1-6% …

More: continued here

Friday, July 3rd, 2009