Archive for May 13th, 2009
However, one blogger pointed out that with the Department of Energy consolidating its surplus plutonium at Savannah River, co-located with the MOX fuel plant already under construction there, South Carolina looked like a reasonable bet. …
More: continued here
Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
Highly radioactive elements and gasses, such as tritium, americium-241 and plutonium, poured out of the collapsed test shafts, leached into the groundwater and worked their way into ponds, creeks and the Bering Sea. …
More: continued here
Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
Or, after they have developed nuclear technologies, trained nuclear scientists and engineers, and plugged into global nuclear markets, will they go one step further and build uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing plants that …
More: continued here
Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
By adopting a process I mentioned in a previous clip journal, the G8 countries could mandate that countries wanting to “go nuclear” only use the “peaceful plutonium process” and if all the countries work in collusion to adopt and …
More: continued here
Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
I will admit that the calculations behind the physics are over my head but I understand magnetic fields, fields of energy, and how it is necessary to smash particles together to capture nuclear energy. … neutrons is splitting by fission, again into hydrogen nuclei{only protons+relativistic electrons}.the energy density release by hydrogen fusion is mush bigger,than the energy density as result of nuclear fission of helium,uranium,plutonium,By the hydrogen fusion the two …
More: continued here
Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
Lovins describes U-233 as “plutonium-like” in fact U-233 has more similarities to U-235 than Pu-239. Lovins makes higly contreidictory claims about the thorium fuel cycle, stating for example that “Thorium’s proliferation . . . problems …
More: continued here
Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
… Test Ban Treaty (CTBT); accelerating spending designed to eliminate “loose nukes” and bomb-making materials (plutonium and enriched uranium) in Russia and beyond; and ending all new production of bomb-making materials worldwide. … Gottemoeller then described U.S. support for the each of the three pillars of the Treaty: disarmament, nonproliferation, and nuclear energy. Perhaps most dramatically, she called on all countries to abide by the NPT, singling out India, …
More: continued here
Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
The Presidents also reaffirmed their support for the ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and we hope to finalize agreements to reduce weapons grade plutonium and other weapons-grade nuclear material by July. Second, the United States and Russia must work … At the same time, the U.S. and Russia are taking practical steps to demonstrate our seriousness in providing all responsible members of the international community with access to civilian nuclear energy. …
More: continued here
Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
Her latest e-mail quotes an op-ed by Elliott Abrams, deputy national security advisor during the Bush administration, promising that the deal “will show the way forward in responsible, transparent uses of nuclear energy — at the very … Or , after they have developed nuclear technologies, trained nuclear scientists and engineers, and plugged into global nuclear markets, will they go one step further and build uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing plants that could …
More: continued here
Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
Potential HazardsThe dominant known hazard on the site comes from the researchreactor core, and the older ‘used’nuclear reactor core also stored onthe site.Likelihood of IncidentAs a major nuclear research facility in Iran and one of their maincentres of …. As such this facilitycertainly increases Iran’s technological options for the production ofnuclear weapons should it chose to do so, with the reactor having thecapacity to yield 9-12.5kg of plutonium each year, …
More: continued here
Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments