Archive for March 25th, 2009
It can be done most prudently by developing multinational nuclear fuel (re-)processing operations such as the proposed Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) program monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), …. Contrary to allegations that uranium and plutonium in spent fuel elements pose a problem because of million-year half-lives, they are separated from fission products by reprocessing and burnt as fuel in future fast-breeder reactors. …
More: continued here
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
With America’s grave energy concerns mounting by the day, the country desperately needs nuclear energy—and nuclear waste reprocessing—now more than ever. Writing in the New York Post, Josh Gilder articulates this urgent need for nuclear…
More: continued here
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
It was, for example, part of the American Baruch Plan, presented to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission on 14 June 1946, to control nuclear energy, to ensure its use only for peaceful purposes, and to eliminate nuclear weapons under … Growing global stockpiles of plutonium and highly enriched uranium are raising the danger of nuclear terrorism in all nations. We will press for international agreement that would ban production of these materials for ever. …
More: continued here
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
What makes nuclear energy itself so dangerous is that every commercial nuclear reactor produces 400-500 pounds of plutonium in a year, along with other nuclear waste material. Just 10-20 pounds of plutonium is needed to make a bomb. …
More: continued here
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
Nuclear Energy No Comments
Weapons-grade plutonium is less radioactive than reactor-grade plutonium. The reason you don’t use reactor-grade Pu in a bomb is that the nuclear reaction will blow it to pieces part of the way through the detonation process, …. An old ( pre-Whoops) nuclear reactor will eventually melt down, not explode. Lots of other stuff in Paranoia explodes just fine, though, not infrequently in nuclear fashion. They even have nuclear hand grenades, with a blast radius way bigger …
More: continued here
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments
At the end of 1976, 8000 tons of enriched uranium and plutonium were lost in the nuclear installations of the United States. The disappearance of 200 pounds of enriched uranium from a nuclear institute in Pennsylvania was one of the …
More: continued here
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments
In September 2007, Israeli F-15I jets destroyed a top-secret nuclear reactor in Syria that was capable of producing weapons-grade plutonium. It has been widely thought that the North Koreans were operating on their own initiative to …
More: continued here
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments
… burning fossil fuels are reaching critical levels affecting the world’s climate, it might be a good time to revisit thorium as a non-proliferative (plutonium burning), low waste production, seemingly abundant nuclear reactor fuel. …
More: continued here
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments
Plutonium and uranium are effective for fission bombs because they are radioactive and splitting them generates the required energy, while lighter elements like hydrogen are useful for fusion bombs (i.e. The hydrogen bomb in World War 2). Fusion bombs are somewhat less … What do you know about the nuclear reactor or nuclear power plant? How Nuclear Energy Can Be Obtained Through Nuclear Fusion? How many Atom bombs were used in the war? What Kinds Of Gases Do Bombs Have? …
More: continued here
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments
What makes nuclear energy itself so dangerous is that every commercial nuclear reactor produces 400-500 pounds of plutonium in a year, along with other nuclear waste material. Just 10-20 pounds of plutonium is needed to make a bomb. …
More: continued here
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
Nuclear Reactor No Comments